And guess who’s teasing answers? None other than Brandon Sklenar, the man behind Spencer Dutton himself. With Alex’s pregnancy now in play, the family lineage just got way more interesting.
So, is this the missing puzzle piece that links Spencer to the modern-day ranch boss? Sklenar’s cryptic tease – “We may get an answer to that” – has fans buzzing.
Is Brandon Sklenar’s Spencer the missing link? 1923 season 2 might finally solve the Dutton family puzzle
1923 Season 2 just kicked off, and Brandon Sklenar is stirring up the biggest mystery – how exactly does Spencer Dutton fit into Kevin Costner’s John Dutton family tree? With Alex now pregnant, the stakes just got higher. And according to Sklenar, answers could finally be coming. He admitted in an interview with THR:
We may get an answer to that at some point this season. Yeah we may. I sure hope we do.
The Yellowstone finale already laid out a key clue – Elsa Dutton’s monologue confirmed seven generations of Duttons. That seemingly positioned Jack (Darren Mann) and Liz Dutton (Michelle Randolph) as John Dutton’s grandparents. But here’s the twist: Alex is carrying Spencer’s baby. So where does that leave them in the Dutton lineage?
Spencer’s journey in 1923 has been a whirlwind. Now, he’s separated from Alex, and with a child on the way, his battle just got way more personal.
Sklenar, who has known 1923’s endgame from the start, says Season 2 is a turning point. If Season 1 built Spencer’s legend, this season is about him stepping fully into his role.
With 1923’s future beyond Season 2 still uncertain, this chapter could finally solve the Dutton puzzle. And if Sklenar’s hint is any clue, we may be closer than ever to linking Spencer’s legacy to Yellowstone’s present.
Candace Owens slams Ryan Reynolds’ legal move, calls out Brandon Sklenar for staying silent
Ryan Reynolds isn’t just cracking jokes; he’s making legal moves. His latest? Filing to dismiss the defamation claims in Justin Baldoni’s lawsuit. Candace Owens isn’t buying it. She argued, calling out his satirical defense.
This filing to dismiss is essentially him saying like na-na boo-boo on the defamation claim. You can’t touch me because it’s satire. He’s arguing that satire is protected speech.
But satire isn’t Reynolds’ only hurdle. Owens points to extortion allegations and other legal messes still looming.
Meanwhile, Brandon Sklenar isn’t off the hook either. Owens blasts him for staying passive, claiming he’s too focused on climbing Hollywood’s ladder.
“He just has to man up and say, ‘I’m sorry.’”
For Owens, it’s not just about legal maneuvers; it’s about accountability. And right now, she’s seeing a whole lot of dodging.
